College Tuition

Since its enactment four decades ago, Pell Grants have helped needy students go to college, but in many ways, the program has veered from its original intentions. Arthur M. Hauptman, a higher education consultant, writes in a recent Inside Higher Ed essay that the program needs to change.

“Instead of disadvantaged students and their families knowing years in advance of their eligibility for aid, the process of applying for and receiving a Pell Grant (and federal student aid more generally) is excessively complicated and often serves as a barrier to access,” he writes.

Rather than modify the program, which has hundreds of pages of rules on the books, Hauptman suggests starting over, with an adjustment in principles for a new era. He says it includes a “radical simplification” of the application and better targeting of benefits for the neediest students.

Among his recommendations:

1. Eliminate the FAFSA and replace it with federal income tax submissions as a way to calculate federal aid eligibility.
   
   
2. Eligibility for Pell Grants would be based on the 1040A income tax provisions. These tax-based amounts could be translated into categories of eligibility rather than precise dollar amounts.
   
   
3. Eligibility for Pell Grants would be more restricted than it is now. Family income of students qualifying for Pell Grants would be limited to a percentage of national median income or some other indicator of family financial ability. Also, eligibility for the program would be limited to students enrolled half time or more.
   
   
4. For any given student, as family income increases, eligibility for tax credits should increase up to the maximum credit as Pell Grant eligibility recedes.
   
   
5. The formula for distributing campus-based student aid funds to institutions and LEAP funds to states should be changed so that in the future any appropriated funds would be distributed on the basis of the number of Pell Grant recipients who graduated in the previous year from that institution or institutions within a state.
   
   
6. Eligibility for in-school interest subsidies in the federal student loan programs in the future would be limited to Pell Grant recipients.

Inside Higher Ed, January 2012

The federal government has a major tool at its disposal to help lower the cost of a college education: the student loan program. By using its influence over student loans, the government could encourage online learning, limit the amount of loans when schools increase costs too quickly and require schools to offer more financial aid....continue reading

You may be responsible for higher tuition. It’s what the public wants, right? That’s what college administrators think: that the higher the tuition, the better the perceived value of their school and its education. And with higher tuition comes more ability to discount those high rates, giving you a “deal” on a valuable education. But some college presidents are bucking this trend by lowering tuition....continue reading

Tuition revenue per student increased in 2011 by up to 5 percent, but at the same time, discounts on those tuition rates are also growing. Moody’s Investors Service’s third annual analysis of tuition revenue shows that more than half of private schools increased their discounts, while two in 10 public schools increased their discounts, according to an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education....continue reading

Despite the calls from Occupy Wall Street and others to wipe out federal student loans, it’s unlikely they’ll be going away. Instead of focusing energy on trying to get rid of them, those in higher education should focus on better ways to finance a college education, according to a column by The Chronicle of Higher Education’s editorial director. He proposes five ways to overhaul student loans....continue reading

The growing cost of college, in the spotlight because of the economic downturn, won’t be fixed with small solutions, according to an article on insidehighered.com. Instead, universities may need to find more innovative ways to cut costs and keep them down for students. Recent congressional hearings provided a few examples, including three-year degree programs and tuition freezes....continue reading

The Occupy Wall Street protesters are decrying higher student-loan debt, but the numbers don’t favor the dramatic claims of students having debt of $100,000 or more. Instead, Department of Education statistics show that 90 percent of undergrads have less than $40,000 in student-loan debt, manageable over the long-term, but difficult for the unemployed. ...continue reading

Universities and colleges are awarding $5.3 billion in aid this year to students who the federal government says don’t need the financial help, figures from the College Board show. Some education experts say such subsidies push lower- and middle-income students deeper into debt. Colleges use this aid to lure high-scoring students with good grades and high test scores, according to a USA Today article....continue reading

Some private religiously-affiliated institutions are cutting tuition rates by double-digit percentages to stay afloat. Other schools are removing “Christian” or “Bible” from their name. Faith-based schools are taking these drastic measures in light of declining church membership and the economic downtown in an effort to attract new students....continue reading

According to a recent report by the American Association of Community Colleges, the percentage of students — especially students of color — who successfully earned credentials from community colleges has increased greatly during the last 22 years. From 1989 to 2010, the percentage of degrees and certificates awarded grew at twice the rate of enrollment.
...continue reading